![]() ![]() There's absolutely no toilet/gross-out humour (which I love, by the way), so it's really a mystery why the stuck-up critics disliked this as much as they did - assuming they even watched it. The sight gags and physical humour aren't exactly intellectual, but they are very funny and fresh most of the time and the comedy is, well, kind of classy. But this is really Atkinson's show and he carries the entire movie, as expected. The supporting cast is good as well, especially Willem Dafoe as an art-house director with his head so far up his own ass and an ego so ridiculously huge he makes Roger Ebert look like Adam Sandler. Rowan Atkinson is a genius and, like most comedians, he never gets the recognition he deserves. The over-the-top body language, the facial expressions, and the convincing vibe you get from Bean that, well, the lights are on but there's nobody home - you can't bring all of this to a character if you're not a good actor. Atkinson has developed this character to absolute perfection and is the only one who could possibly play the lovable idiot. Bean is just a matter of goofing around and making stupid noises, I'd like to see you do it. Rowan Atkinson is at his absolute best and I think it's about time he gets an Academy Award. The plot is hardly the focus of the film, though - it's all about Bean and the often awkward, often painful, and always funny situations he gets himself into. Bean must help the kid find his father again. Bean wins a ticket to Cannes, where he accidentally separates a young boy from his father. It is also absolutely hilarious and, thank god, unlike the original movie this one doesn't recycle gags from the TV series. It's a feel-good movie which actually makes you feel good (!!) and never turns into awkward sappiness. It is not only about ten times better than its weak 1997 predecessor (which the film wisely ignores completely), it is a genuinely great movie. I on the other hand have seen this movie and I can honestly say that it blew me away. Either these people just don't have a sense of humour, if I may be that harsh, or they didn't even see the flick and just reviewed it based on the weak trailer and their own false assumptions. Bean's Holiday for being unfunny, a cow milked dry, same old same old, blah blah blah. Here's the deal: Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE has panned Mr. A fun family film, especially if you like the Mr. This one feels fresh and.well my summary pretty much says it all. Bean's Holiday' is much better than it's prequel. The editing seems good enough but I found the ending to be slightly choppy. Yes, because of that the film is visually impressive too. Cinematography and visuals do a great job by portraying the stunning locations of France. He's a wonderful comedian and it's great to seem him back as Mr. Bean's Holiday' clearly belongs to Atkinson. Emma de Caunes as Sabine is charming and pretty and child actor Max Baldry as Stepan is impressive (unlike those annoying movie kids who 'beg' the audience to love them when getting on their nerve). ![]() Bean's sketches too so there is a chance that those who don't like him, might not enjoy the film. Though the comedy itself doesn't rely on witty dialogues, there's plenty of fresh slapstick and silly moments that made me laugh. Beam also befriends a young Russian, Stepan and a French actress, Sabine. There are several Beanish slapstick moments set throughout the dazzling spectacular French locations. And of course, he's playing the character he immortalized, the goofy Mr. I think the last time I saw him on screen was in 'Love Actually' (not so-great film but Atkinson was awesome). It's great to see Rowan Atkinson back on the big screen after a long time. ![]() Bean is back and he's going to France on a holiday adventure. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |